Client name withheld under NDA.
Engineering consultancies in Singapore win most of their work through proposals and tenders, judged by developers, building owners and main contractors who read a dozen similar submissions. The firms are technically strong, but their brands often grew one project at a time: a logo from the founding year, proposals pieced together from old documents, and a website that lists every service at once. When every proposal looks alike, buyers fall back on price. Searches for branding agency singapore run at about 590 a month and corporate branding singapore at about 90, but few of the agencies behind them work with technical firms whose real brand lives in a 40-page proposal, not on a billboard.
This consultancy designed mechanical and electrical systems for commercial buildings and had about 25 staff. It had become one of the go-to firms for upgrading older buildings to meet energy-efficiency targets, but nothing in its materials said so. Six different versions of its logo were in use, and each proposal took a senior engineer about 3.5 days to assemble. Over the previous six months it had won 8 of 36 proposals, a 22% win rate. It received about 9 enquiries a month, only 3 of them through the website. The directors wanted a brand that matched the quality of the engineering, without losing the reputation the name already carried.
| Metric | Before the rebrand |
|---|---|
| Proposal win rate (per 6 months) | 22% |
| Time to produce a proposal | 3.5 days |
| Staff using the new templates | 0 |
| Logo versions in circulation | 6 |
| Enquiries per month, all channels | 9 |
| Web enquiries per month | 3 |
We interviewed the two directors, four senior engineers and six clients, and reviewed 12 recent proposals, half won and half lost. Clients described the firm the same way: the team you call when an older building has to be upgraded without shutting it down. We turned that into a positioning statement, three service lines in priority order and a short set of proof points.
Technical firms often try to look capable of everything. Buyers choosing an engineer for a retrofit want a specialist. Naming what the firm was already known for gave every later design and writing decision something to point back to.
The firm's registered name was long, and staff, clients and documents used four different short forms. We checked whether the name should change and recommended keeping it, with one agreed short form, which we checked against the ACRA register and a trademark search before using it. We then presented three logo routes. The directors chose one built around the short form, refined over two rounds.
An established name carries years of goodwill with developers and contractors. Keeping it, and fixing how it is written, kept that goodwill while removing the confusion. The trademark search meant the firm would not have to undo the work later.
We built a colour palette and type system that worked in print, on screen and in engineering drawings, including a set of colours for charts and system diagrams. A 16-page guideline covered logo use, colours, type, photography of completed projects and the tone for proposals.
Proposals in this sector are full of tables, schematics and charts. A palette designed for diagrams as well as covers is what made the documents look consistent from the first page to the appendix, which is where buyers spend most of their time.
We designed letterheads, business cards, email signatures, a report template, a 20-slide pitch deck and a proposal template in Word with a library of reusable sections: firm profile, team CVs, project references and method statements. Each section was rewritten in the new tone, so engineers could assemble a proposal instead of writing one from scratch.
For an engineering firm, the proposal is the brand. A template with ready, approved sections did two jobs at once. It made every submission look like it came from the same firm, and it cut the time senior engineers spent on formatting rather than on the technical response.
We ran two training sessions for the whole team on the templates and guidelines, replaced old files on the shared drive and set a switchover date after which old templates were archived. For the website, we wrote handover notes for the firm's own web developer: page structure based on the three service lines, copy for the key pages, colour and type settings, and image guidance. The new site went live in Week 17.
Rebrands fail when old files keep circulating. Archiving the old templates on a fixed date, and training every staff member, is why 23 of 25 people were using the new templates within a few months. Detailed handover notes let the developer build the site without guessing.
In the six months after launch, the firm won 12 of 39 proposals, a 31% win rate against 22% before. Proposals took about 1.5 days to put together instead of 3.5, and 23 of the 25 staff were using the new templates. Enquiries across all channels rose from 9 to 14 a month, and web enquiries went from 3 to 7 a month once the new site was live. Only one version of the logo is now in circulation, down from six. The directors also noticed a quieter change: clients started describing the firm in the same words the positioning used, which is usually the sign a brand has stuck.
| Metric | Baseline | Month 6 after launch | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal win rate (per 6 months) | 22% | 31% | +9 pts |
| Time to produce a proposal | 3.5 days | 1.5 days | -57% |
| Staff using the new templates | 0 | 23 | +23 |
| Logo versions in circulation | 6 | 1 | -83% |
| Enquiries per month, all channels | 9 | 14 | +56% |
| Web enquiries per month | 3 | 7 | +133% |
Win rate before = 8 of 36 proposals in the 6 months before the rebrand. Win rate after = 12 of 39 proposals in the 6 months after launch. 23 of 25 staff use the new templates.
Positioning, name check, logo, colour, type and guidelines.
Stationery, pitch deck, proposal template, team training and the new website.
Win rate reached 31%, proposals took 1.5 days and web enquiries reached 7 a month.
If you run a consultancy in Singapore, a new logo will not win more work on its own. Naming the problem you are best at solving gave this firm a reason to be chosen, and every design decision followed from it.
For firms that win work through tenders, the proposal is what buyers study. Putting most of the effort into the proposal template, rather than the business cards, is where the win rate came from.
Most rebrands leak because old templates stay on the shared drive. A switchover date, two training sessions and archived files got 23 of 25 staff onto the new brand within months.
Brand strategy and visibility for Singapore businesses.
Results across SEO, paid media, content, production and more.
How a cafe's new identity lifted monthly revenue 46%.
We will look at your proposals and show where your brand is costing you work.
Get a free brand review. We will look at your recent proposals, pitch materials and website, then show you where your brand is helping you win work and where it is costing you.